FAQs about urban design for business and adjacent areas
Why are you proposing to make changes to the management of areas where business and non-business zoned land boundaries meet, if current rules generally work?
While the current District Plan’s rules have been found to be generally effective for management of interfaces between business and non-business zones as well as urban design in business-zoned town centres, making some minor amendments to address identified issues would make it more effective. Also by providing greater clarity, the draft changes would help achieve high quality urban design within business-zoned town centres.
Would the draft changes to rules that commercial and industrial businesses have to meet mean that businesses will have to apply for more resource consents?
With the draft changes we’re aiming to strike a balance between enabling business and protecting the look and feel of the neighbouring residential areas.
It is usually the developer of a new business site who needs to apply for a resource consent and not the tenant who later occupies the site. Also it’s important to note that new business developments almost always require some form of resource consent, as they’re usually a controlled activity. With the draft changes additional resource consents would potentially
be required if the developer didn’t want to abide by the new standards, for example if they were opposed to having an increased building setback or additional landscaping.
Why are you making changes to how business zones are referenced within the new District Plan?
Where can I find more information about the District Plan Review of rules related to management of interfaces between business and non-business zones to date?